<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Club for Growth</title>
      <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/</link>
      <description>The Club for Growth Blog</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:39:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Public School Teachers Love Private Schools</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Public school teachers in urban areas <a href="http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2007/01/public-teachers-private-choices.html" target=new>are more likely</a> than other families to send their own kids to private school.  ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/public_school_teachers_love_pr.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/public_school_teachers_love_pr.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:39:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New Books in the Mail</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I just received these two books in the mail from Amazon.com:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Crisis-Abundance-Rethinking-Health-Care/dp/1930865899/sr=1-1/qid=1169216516/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-7457287-4237453?ie=UTF8&s=books" target="_blank">Crisis of Abundance: Rethinking How We Pay for Health Care</a> - Arnold Kling</p>

<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Nations-Books-Changed-World/dp/0871139499/sr=8-1/qid=1169216481/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-7457287-4237453?ie=UTF8&s=books" target="_blank">P.J. O'Rourke on the Wealth of Nations</a> - P.J. O'Rourke</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/new_books_in_the_mail.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/new_books_in_the_mail.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:19:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Tax Pledge Breakers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Last night, the House passed a tax hike for the first time in 13 years.  It was <a href="http://www.house.gov/htbin/blog_inc?BLOG,in06_pence_rsc,blog,999,All,Item%20not%20found,ID=070118_0247,TEMPLATE=postingdetail.shtml" target="_blank">a bill</a> that specifically sticks it to oil companies.  As noted in the previous post, the final tally was <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll040.xml" target="_blank">264-163</a>, with 36 Republicans siding with the Democrats to vote YES, and 4 Democrats siding with the Republicans to vote NO.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, Dan Clifton at Americans for Tax Reform sent me the following list of congressmen who broke their pledge never to raise taxes by voting YES on the bill.  Those in <i>italics</i> are Democrats.</p>


<table border="0"  width="100%">
  <tr><!-- Row 1 -->
     <td><b><u>Lawmakers</u></b></td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td><b><u>Lawmakers</u></b></td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 2 -->
     <td>Aderholt (AL-04)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Johnson (IL-15)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 3 -->
     <td><i>Andrews (NJ-01)</i></td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Jones (NC-03)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 4 -->
     <td>Bartlett (MD-06)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Kirk (IL-10)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 5 -->
     <td>Brown-Waite (FL-05)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Knollenberg (MI-09)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 6 -->
     <td>Buchanan (FL-13)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Kuhl (NY-29)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 7 -->
     <td>Capito (WV-02)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>LaHood (IL-18)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 8 -->
     <td><i>Chandler (KY-06)</i></td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>LoBiondo (NJ-02)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 9 -->
     <td>Dent (PA-15)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Miller (MI-10)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 10 -->
     <td><i>Ellsworth (IN-08)</i></td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Petri (WI-06)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 11 -->
     <td>Emerson (MO-08)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Ramstad (MN-03)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 12 -->
     <td>Everett (AL-02)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Reichert (WA-08)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 13 -->
     <td>Ferguson (NJ-07)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Rogers (AL-03)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 14 -->
     <td>Fortenberry (NE-01)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Ros-Lehtinen (FL-18)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 15 -->
     <td>Gerlach (PA-06)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Saxton (NJ-03)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 16 -->
     <td>Gilchrest (MD-01)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td>Smith (NJ-04)</td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
  <tr><!-- Row 17 -->
     <td>Hayes (NC-08)</td><!-- Col 1 -->
     <td><i>Taylor (MS-04)</i></td><!-- Col 2 -->
  </tr>
</table>


]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/tax_pledge_breakers.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/tax_pledge_breakers.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:11:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>First Tax Hike in 13 Years</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The House is voting on the first tax hike in 13 years.  Since the Contract with America was born, the House GOP majority had opposed all tax increases.  But within a month of officially being in the majority, the Democrats are now voting for one.  Didn't take long, did it?

You better believe that this is a sign of things to come.  And the worst part is that <em>dozens</em> of Republicans are expected to vote with the Democrats on this.  Where have all the fiscal conservatives gone?

Stay tuned for updates.

<strong>UPDATE (6:09pm)</strong>: The bill just passed 264-163 to thunderous applause, with 36 Republicans joining the Democrats.  I feel like we're in a New Deal Congress.  It's almost surreal.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/first_tax_hike_in_13_years.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/first_tax_hike_in_13_years.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:52:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pence on Fox News</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Congressman Mike Pence, elected with Club member support in 2000, was on the Fox News Channel earlier today to talk about tax hike rumors surrounding Social Security reform.  The video quality is a little crummy, but it still works.</p>

<p><div align="center"><embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-4198558839246641343&hl=en" flashvars=""> </embed></div></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/pence_on_fox_news.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/pence_on_fox_news.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:27:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Blog Readership On Capitol Hill</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Danny Glover at National Journal has <a href="http://beltwayblogroll.nationaljournal.com/archives/2007/01/post_6.php" target=new>the top ten list</a> of most popular blogs on Capitol Hill.  Not surprisingly, it's top heavy with lefty blogs.  The Right is still lagging, but from my perspective, it's gaining ground.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/blog_readership_on_capitol_hil.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/blog_readership_on_capitol_hil.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:24:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&apos;That&apos;s a Whole Lot of Federal&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Jeb Hensarling is off to a great start as chairman of the RSC.</p>

<blockquote><p><b>WASHINGTON, D.C.</b> - Congressman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), Chairman of the Republican Study Committee (RSC), today issued the following statement as time on the House Democrats' "100 Hours agenda" runs out:</p>   

<p>"The Democrats' 100 hours agenda has accomplished very little for people and families across America.  On the other hand, they have done a great deal to expand government dependency and control at the expense of individual empowerment, incentive, and private enterprise.  And it should be noted that while it took Democrats even less than 100 hours to raise taxes, not 1 cent is going to deficit reduction.</p>  

<p>"Thus far, Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats have attempted to: empower the federal government to set drug prices that are already being successfully negotiated in the free market...federally mandate a higher wage that will keep younger workers from job opportunities; push students into a federally run bureaucratic loan program; and federally impose billions in fees and taxes that will cost American workers jobs and cause millions of Americans to become even more dependent on foreign oil.  That is a whole lot of federal."</p>

<p>"Though very few of these agenda items will actually become law in their current form, Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats clearly have chosen to empower the federal government over families in America."</p></blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/thats_a_whole_lot_of_federal.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/thats_a_whole_lot_of_federal.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:03:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Byrd Secures Pork Months in Advance</title>
         <description><![CDATA[According to a West Virginia newspaper, Senator Robert "King of Pork" Byrd <a href="http://wvgazette.com/section/Today/2007011716" target=new>has already secured</a> more than $110 million in pork for his home state.  And this is before the appropriations process has even begun!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/byrd_secures_pork_months_in_ad.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/byrd_secures_pork_months_in_ad.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:44:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>HOUSE Key Vote Alert - Feeney Letter</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Club for Growth, with its 40,000 members, plans to score the signatures of a recent coalition letter to President Bush, led by Congressman Tom Feeney, as a pro-economic growth measure in its annual Congressional Scorecard.</p>

<p><b>Signers of the letter pledge to sustain any veto made by the President on any tax increase submitted to him by Congress.</b></p>

<p>The problem in Washington hasn’t been a lack of revenue; it’s been a lack of spending restraint.  Tax hikes are counterproductive and anti-growth and Congress should vigorously oppose them.</p>

<p>A copy of the letter is reprinted below.  To sign onto it, please contact Tonnie Wybensinger in Rep. Feeney’s office at <a href="mailto:t.wybensinger@mail.house.gov">t.wybensinger@mail.house.gov</a>.</p>

<p>Our Congressional Scorecard for the 110th Congress provides a comprehensive rating of how well or how poorly each member of Congress supports pro-growth, free-market policies and will be distributed to our members and to the public.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/house_key_vote_alert_feeney_le.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/house_key_vote_alert_feeney_le.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Key Vote Alert</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:33:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Speaking of Pork</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Vietnam seems to be getting the hang of capitalism.  One farmer in the country <a href="http://www.pigprogress.net/ts_pi/pigprogress.portal/enc/_nfpb/true/tspi_portlet_news_singleeditorschoice1_3_actionOverride/___2Fportlets___2Fts___2Fge___2Fnews_singleeditorschoice1___2Fcontent___2FshowDetailsList/_windowLabel/tspi_portlet_news_singleeditorschoice1_3/tspi_portlet_news_singleeditorschoice1_3id/11406/_desktopLabel/pigprogress/_pageLabel/tspi_page_news_content/index.html" target="_blank">is getting innovative</a>.  From the indispensable Pig Progress website:</p>

<blockquote><p>A Vietnamese pig farmer is using a new and interesting way to boost productivity. He believes that the melodies of Beethoven, Mozart and Schubert help promote productivity while his 3000 pigs have their noses in their troughs.</p>

<p>"I saw that my pigs started eating more and that they were gaining weight faster than usual," said [Nguyen Chi] Cong, who adds that he blasts the tunes of the composers daily from 7:00 – 11:00 am and 14:00 – 16:00 pm.</p>

<p>"I think I am the first farmer in Vietnam to apply this technique."</p></blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/speaking_of_pork_1.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/speaking_of_pork_1.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:53:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The &apos;Big Daddy&apos; Speech</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In light of the earmark reform debate currently going on in the Senate, it seems appropriate to resurrect the "Big Daddy" speech given by Robert Byrd.  He's the one most strenuously opposed to reform and he's the one most adamantly opposed to Gregg's rescission amendment.  This video clip is a classic.</p>

<p><div align="center"><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ocWuPkNLla4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ocWuPkNLla4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></div></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/the_big_daddy_speech.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/the_big_daddy_speech.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:39:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Thursday&apos;s Daily News</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<strong>THE DAILY NEWS</strong>
<a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-514975~Robert_Bluey__How_bloggers_took_on_Harry_Reid_and_won_on_earmark_reform.html" target=new>How Bloggers Took on Harry Reid and Won</a> - Rob Bluey, DC Examiner
<a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/cc/?id=110009540" target=new>Shades of Grey Davis</a> - John Fund, Wall Street Journal
<a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AlanReynolds/2007/01/18/looking_high_and_low_for_taxes" target=new>Looking High and Low for Taxes</a> - Alan Reynolds, Townhall.com
<a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009539" target=new>It's Hillary Versus Everybody Else</a> - Wall Street Journal Editorial
<a href="http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=253930038179049" target=new>Castrocare Quacks</a> - IBD Editorial

<a href="http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=011807A" target=new>The Big Three: Education, Health Care and Leisure</a> - Arnold Kling, TCS Daily
<a href="http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10890" target=new>Scandal and Disgrace</a> - David Hogberg, American Spectator
<a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/editorial/view.bg?articleid=177706" target=new>McCain No Longer Rocks in Granite State</a> - Brett Arends, Boston Herald
<a href="http://www.american.com/archive/2007/january-february-magazine-contents/0116-celebrity-power" target=new>Celebrity Power</a> - David Robinson, American.com
<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/01/17/richest-women-entertainment-tech-media-cz_lg_richwomen07_0118womenstars_lander.html" target=new>The 20 Richest Women In Entertainment</a> - Forbes.com]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/thursdays_daily_news_146.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/thursdays_daily_news_146.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Daily News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:27:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Democrats Block Gregg Amendment</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Senate Democrats refused to allow debate on the Gregg Amendment last night, and instead, sought a vote to end debate on the entire bill.  Thankfully, that vote failed 51-46 (60 votes are needed).</p>

<p>In response, Senator Gregg issued this statement:</p>

<blockquote><p>“Despite reaching a good-faith agreement with the Democratic leadership that my fiscally responsible amendment, <i>A Second Look at Wasteful Spending</i>, would be taken up at another time, I was disappointed to learn that objections from another Democratic senator effectively blocked that agreement. I fully support ethics reform – in fact, I offered my amendment to strengthen the ethics reform package – so will continue to push for a vote on this reasonable proposal to reduce wasteful federal spending. I cannot support ending debate on this bill until the Senate has had a chance to fully debate and vote on a proposal to improve the government’s stewardship of taxpayer dollars, and I look forward to working with my colleagues across the aisle to achieve that goal.”</p></blockquote>

<p> The unidentified Democratic senator that Gregg is referring to is the King of Pork, Robert Byrd.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/democrats_block_gregg_amendmen.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/democrats_block_gregg_amendmen.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:24:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Original Free to Choose Video Now Online</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Free to Choose, the classic 10-part TV series by Milton Friedman is now available <a href="http://www.ideachannel.tv/">online</a> so you can watch it on your computer.  <a href="http://www.ideachannel.tv/">IdeaChannel.tv</a> also is streaming the updated 5-part 1990 version of the program.

While there may not be a free lunch, at least there is a free version of Free to Choose.

Don't forget to tune in to the National PBS Broadcast “The Power of Choice: The Life and Ideas of Milton Friedman” on January 29.  You can check local listings <a href="http://www.freetochoosemedia.org/production/POC/docs/poc_broadcast_info.pdf">here (PDF)</a>.

Interestingly, the local <a href="http://www.weta.org/tv/whatson/index.php?station=WETA&time=Overnight&fromtime=true&sdate=1%2F29%2F2007&cal_month=1&cal_year=2007">Washington DC affiliate is broadcasting the program at 11 PM</a>, instead of the 9 PM and 10 PM slots used nearly everywhere else.

And what does WETA have on at 9 PM?  Six Wives of Henry VIII.

Shame on you, WETA-TV.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/original_free_to_choose_video.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/original_free_to_choose_video.php</guid>
         <author>David Keating</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:47:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Hot Debate in the Senate Right Now</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Tune into <a href="http://www.c-span.org/watch/cspan2_rm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS2" target=new>C-SPAN</a> right now.  The Democrats are refusing to allow a vote on an amendment offered by Senator Judd Gregg that would give the President rescission authority, which is similar to the line-item veto.  

Reid has been preaching about ethics reform and his strong desire to reduce wasteful spending, but his talk is cheap.  He blocked strong earmark reform last week until he was forced to retreat and now he's blocking a vote on another important measure that would help break the big-spending habits of Congress.

<strong>UPDATE (4:26pm)</strong>: Dick Durbin is now speaking out against the amendment as well.

<strong>UPDATE (4:34pm)</strong>: Dianne Feinstein just said that Gregg's rather simple amendment is "impossible to understand".  Priceless.

<strong>UPDATE (4:37pm)</strong>: Andrew Moylan at NTU has more coverage <a href="http://blog.ntu.org/main/post.php?post_id=1719" target=new>here</a>.  Here's <a href="http://www.examiner.com/blogs/tapscotts_copy_desk/2007/1/17/Reid-Opposing-Another-Earmark-Reform" target=new>a blog post</a> by Mark Tapscott as well.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/hot_debate_in_the_senate_right.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.citizensclubforgrowth.org/2007/01/hot_debate_in_the_senate_right.php</guid>
         <author>Andrew Roth</author>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:19:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
